From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC] stuff from tcp-2.6 partially merged to upcoming net-2.6.24? Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 03:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070808.035505.110907605.davem@davemloft.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:53829 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751246AbXHHKzF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 06:55:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org =46rom: "Ilpo_J=E4rvinen" Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 16:19:58 +0300 (EEST) > Do you have any suggestion how I should proceed? Or do you perhaps ob= ject=20 > such partial merge completely? ...I could try to come up with a clean= ed up=20 > patch series which has original and their bug fix parts combined to a= =20 > single patch per change (would provide cleaner history and shouldn't = be=20 > very hard to do either)... Thank you for doing the rebase. I agree with you that we should seperate out as much of the non-rb-tree stuff as possible and put it into net-2.6.24 I'll will try hard to make time to look at your rebase and try to move things forward. I've been all-consumed by the NAPI work and a driver I've been writing in the background for the past few weeks.