From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: IPV6_PKTINFO socket option
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:16:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708081216.51283@strip-the-willow> (raw)
Yoshifuji-san,
a few weeks earlier I enquired about the IPV6_PKTINFO socket option to get at the
destination address of datagrams, where you replied that this option is `deprecated'.
There are three problems:
1. On i386 it works as described in section 4 of RFC 3542, using IPV6_RECVPKTINFO
as sticky socket option to pull out the IPV6_PKTINFO cmsg header fields.
2. On sparc64 with the same kernel IPV6_PKTINFO works without problems, even pulls
out the cmsg fields correctly. Conversely, when trying to set the IPV6_RECVPKTINFO
sticky option on the socket, no cmsg fields are generated.
The kernel is of the same date and revision as the i386 kernel - library issue ???
It is very annoying, since the application needs to run on both architectures.
3. Misc:
* The option is mentioned 9 times in the index of "Unix Network Programming"
(3rd ed., p. 969). Moreover, an entire section (27.7) is devoted to this topic.
* It might be good to give at least a warning message in the syslog that the
IPV6_PKTINFO socket option is no longer supported. That would save many users
grief. An example how this was done in DCCP is in net/dccp/proto.c:
case DCCP_SOCKOPT_PACKET_SIZE:
DCCP_WARN("sockopt(PACKET_SIZE) is deprecated: fix your app");
Maybe this is due to a misunderstanding - in which case I'd be grateful for any clarifications.
Thanks
Gerrit
next reply other threads:[~2007-08-08 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-08 11:16 Gerrit Renker [this message]
2007-08-08 22:02 ` IPV6_PKTINFO socket option David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708081216.51283@strip-the-willow \
--to=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).