From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: net-2.6.24 GIT state Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:27:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070809.182719.99676246.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20070809.041034.93473045.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:58011 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751906AbXHJB1T convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2007 21:27:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org =46rom: "Ilpo_J=E4rvinen" Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:40:07 +0300 (EEST) > Next step: >=20 > http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/ijjarvin/tcp-rebase/after-reorder/ >=20 > ...I put some effort to reorganization and there's the result, please= =20 > _don't_ take the new SACK block-validator yet as I haven't yet put it= =20 > under any testing (it's the only difference this reordering of patche= s=20 > seems to have introduced :-)). The first five commits touch left_out = (4=20 > latest fix bug and "flaws" I made in the first commit), I could combi= ne=20 > them into a single one if you want to. I applied everything up until the SACK validator to net-2.6.24 Thanks for doing all of this merging work, I very much appreciate it. > ...Notice that part of the next step includes work that hasn't yet be= en=20 > posted to netdev at all (was from my not yet submitted wip portion of= =20 > it). Would you prefer me to post them using the usual procedure? Everything I hit today which had not been posted before was trivial fix or a reasonable small cleanup. Why don't you just post the patches to the list one-by-one from now on so we can review them in parallel with merging into net-2.6.24? Thanks again Ilpo!