From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] sysctl: Fix neighbour table sysctls. Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070809.184921.11594412.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20070810.104710.28739250.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org, adobriyan@sw.ru, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:43545 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757658AbXHJBtV (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2007 21:49:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070810.104710.28739250.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:47:10 +0900 (JST) > I disagree. It is bad to remove existing interface. > Ditto for other patches. I think perhaps you misunderstand what Eric is doing. sys_sysctl() isn't working properly for these cases and it is both a deprecated interface and not worth the pain of adding support in these cases. The fact that nobody complains that none of this stuff works via sys_sysctl() to me proves that it is never used.