Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, satyam@infradead.org,
	Joel.Becker@oracle.com, k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com, mpm@selenic.com
Subject: Re: [patch 26/28] netconsole: Support dynamic reconfiguration using configfs
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:35:23 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070810.153523.57443099.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708102112.l7ALC9oD009457@imap1.linux-foundation.org>

From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:12:09 -0700

> From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>
> 
> Based upon initial work by Keiichi Kii <k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com>.
> 
> This patch introduces support for dynamic reconfiguration (adding, removing
> and/or modifying parameters of netconsole targets at runtime) using a
> userspace interface exported via configfs.  Documentation is also updated
> accordingly.
> 
> Issues and brief design overview:
> 
> (1) Kernel-initiated creation / destruction of kernel objects is not
>     possible with configfs -- the lifetimes of the "config items" is managed
>     exclusively from userspace.  But netconsole must support boot/module
>     params too, and these are parsed in kernel and hence netpolls must be
>     setup from the kernel.  Joel Becker suggested to separately manage the
>     lifetimes of the two kinds of netconsole_target objects -- those created
>     via configfs mkdir(2) from userspace and those specified from the
>     boot/module option string.  This adds complexity and some redundancy here
>     and also means that boot/module param-created targets are not exposed
>     through the configfs namespace (and hence cannot be updated / destroyed
>     dynamically).  However, this saves us from locking / refcounting
>     complexities that would need to be introduced in configfs to support
>     kernel-initiated item creation / destroy there.
> 
> (2) In configfs, item creation takes place in the call chain of the
>     mkdir(2) syscall in the driver subsystem.  If we used an ioctl(2) to
>     create / destroy objects from userspace, the special userspace program is
>     able to fill out the structure to be passed into the ioctl and hence
>     specify attributes such as local interface that are required at the time
>     we set up the netpoll.  For configfs, this information is not available at
>     the time of mkdir(2).  So, we keep all newly-created targets (via
>     configfs) disabled by default.  The user is expected to set various
>     attributes appropriately (including the local network interface if
>     required) and then write(2) "1" to the "enabled" attribute.  Thus,
>     netpoll_setup() is then called on the set parameters in the context of
>     _this_ write(2) on the "enabled" attribute itself.  This design enables
>     the user to reconfigure existing netconsole targets at runtime to be
>     attached to newly-come-up interfaces that may not have existed when
>     netconsole was loaded or when the targets were actually created.  All this
>     effectively enables us to get rid of custom ioctls.
> 
> (3) Ultra-paranoid configfs attribute show() and store() operations, with
>     sanity and input range checking, using only safe string primitives, and
>     compliant with the recommendations in Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.txt.
> 
> (4) A new function netpoll_print_options() is created in the netpoll API,
>     that just prints out the configured parameters for a netpoll structure. 
>     netpoll_parse_options() is modified to use that and it is also exported to
>     be used from netconsole.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>
> Acked-by: Keiichi Kii <k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com>
> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
> Cc: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

This looks good to me, applied to net-2.6.24, thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2007-08-10 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-10 21:12 [patch 26/28] netconsole: Support dynamic reconfiguration using configfs akpm
2007-08-10 22:35 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070810.153523.57443099.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=satyam@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox