From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [patch (testing)] Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:48:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20070810084841.GA11086@elte.hu> References: <20070810083720.GE1764@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jean-Baptiste Vignaud , "marcin.slusarz" , tglx , torvalds , linux-kernel , shemminger , linux-net , netdev , akpm , alan To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:34431 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756880AbXHJIsx (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 04:48:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070810083720.GE1764@ff.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Vignaud wrote: > ... > > I was still testing on -rc2: > > Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend > > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200 > > > > For me after 1day 20hours, the network is still up, with more than > > 1To of network traffic. HZ was 1000, i restart with HZ=100. > > For me it's enough too but Thomas seems to doubt. seem to doubt what? That rc2 fixes the symptom? That is a sure thing, and we never doubted that. I think you might have misunderstood what Thomas said and meant, so please just state your opinion unambiguously so that we can fix any mis-communication :) Ingo