netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@linux-foundation.org,
	vignaud@xandmail.fr, marcin.slusarz@gmail.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-net@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc2: WARNING: at kernel/irq/resend.c:70 check_irq_resend()
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:33:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070810093353.GA19777@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070810091231.GH1764@ff.dom.local>


* Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl> wrote:

> > > > +               }
> > > >  #ifdef CONFIG_HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
> > 
> > we used the hw-resend method unconditionally, right?
> 
> Right: unconditionally on a condition they are not edges...
> 
> But, since not resending at all seems to work so good in testing, I 
> thought, _SW_RESEND could be considered as an unnecessarily 
> complicated alternative.
> 
> Now, I'm a bit confused...

the idea is multi-pronged:

 - Primarily, we want to fix the regression. 2.6.20 worked, 2.6.21 
   didnt, that has to be fixed, no matter what - end of story. But we've 
   got a wide selection of patches for that purpose now, so what matters 
   at this point is the secondary question:

 - we want to know _why exactly_ the hang happens. We now have a pretty 
   good theory: hw-resend hangs the IO-APIC. (there is a delicate dance
   between local APICs and IO-APICs for level-triggered irqs, and if we
   interject via hw-resending via the local APIC, existing races, hw
   bugs or weaknesses in our hw-resend implementation might be exposed)

and even though we now have a wide selection of patches we really want 
to get to the bottom of the problem so that we can fix the bug that got 
exposed: apparently hw resend doesnt always work with level-triggered 
irqs.

Note that the hw-resend sequence can trigger _even without our original 
patch that triggered the regression_, it's just much less likely to 
happen, so this is a pre-existing IO-APIC/APIC code bug that could 
trigger anytime, and which we want to see fixed.

To confirm this theory - does the debug-patch below fix the hang? If it 
fixes the hang then the theory is confirmed and then the right solution 
is to retrigger an IRQ for level-triggered irqs with the proper 
trigger-type set.

	Ingo

------------------>
Not-Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -735,7 +735,8 @@ void fastcall send_IPI_self(int vector)
 	 * Wait for idle.
 	 */
 	apic_wait_icr_idle();
-	cfg = APIC_DM_FIXED | APIC_DEST_SELF | vector | APIC_DEST_LOGICAL;
+	cfg = APIC_DM_FIXED | APIC_DEST_SELF | vector | APIC_DEST_LOGICAL |
+		APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG;
 	/*
 	 * Send the IPI. The write to APIC_ICR fires this off.
 	 */

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-10  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-09 15:03 2.6.23-rc2: WARNING: at kernel/irq/resend.c:70 check_irq_resend() John Stoffel
2007-08-09 15:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-10  8:05   ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-08-10  8:23     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-10  8:30       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-10  8:49         ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-10  8:56           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-10  9:12             ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-10  9:33               ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-08-10 10:05                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-10 10:16                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-13  7:13                     ` Marcin Ślusarz
2007-08-10 10:13                 ` Stephen Hemminger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-10 12:27 Jean-Baptiste Vignaud
2007-08-10 11:35 Jean-Baptiste Vignaud
2007-08-08 18:09 2.6.23-rc2: WARNING " Indan Zupancic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070810093353.GA19777@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=john@stoffel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vignaud@xandmail.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).