netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: latten@austin.ibm.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, sgrubb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] improved xfrm_audit_log() patch
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:24:05 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070821.002405.88473654.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708151616.l7FGGTk9001632@faith.austin.ibm.com>

From: Joy Latten <latten@austin.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:16:29 -0500

> On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 18:32 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >From: Joy Latten <latten@austin.ibm.com>
> >Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:56:47 -0500
> >
> >> @@ -426,10 +426,15 @@ struct xfrm_audit
> >>  };
> >>  
> >>  #ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
> >> -extern void xfrm_audit_log(uid_t auid, u32 secid, int type, int result,
> >> -		    struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_state *x);
> >> +extern void xfrm_audit_log(struct xfrm_audit audit_info, int result,
> >> +			   __be32 flowid, struct xfrm_policy *xp, 
> >> +			   struct xfrm_state *x, char *buf);
> >
> >Passing audit_info as an aggregate argument puts them into
> >previous argument registers, or if they are not enough it
> >goes either partially of wholly onto the stack, depending
> >upon architecture.
> >
> >In fact you've made the argument register usage worse than
> >in your previous revision. :-/
> >
> >Perhaps you meant to pass "struct xfrm_audit *" instead?
> 
> Revised patch to pass pointer to struct xfrm_audit.
> Sorry, I missed that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joy Latten <latten@austin.ibm.com>

Looks good, applied to net-2.6.24, thanks Joy.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-21  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-15 16:16 [PATCH] improved xfrm_audit_log() patch Joy Latten
2007-08-21  7:24 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-08-22 19:51   ` David Miller
2007-08-23  1:29     ` Joy Latten
2007-08-23  3:05       ` David Miller
2007-08-23 17:15         ` Joy Latten
2007-08-23 20:07           ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-02 20:56 Joy Latten
2007-08-08  1:32 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070821.002405.88473654.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=latten@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).