From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC] Wild and crazy ideas involving struct sk_buff Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070822.143627.62367286.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200708221631.34234.paul.moore@hp.com> <20070822212005.GR32236@postel.suug.ch> <200708221726.36783.paul.moore@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tgraf@suug.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: paul.moore@hp.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:42263 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759911AbXHVVgb (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:36:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200708221726.36783.paul.moore@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Paul Moore Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:26:36 -0400 > Was it just a thought, or was there some actual design/code/patchset > to go along with it that described the idea? It was a thought mentioned at the first two netconfs, but it went nowhere because the more we discussed the implementation the more horrific it began to sound :-)