From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: [RFC] Wild and crazy ideas involving struct sk_buff Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:20:55 -0400 Message-ID: <200708221820.56516.paul.moore@hp.com> References: <200708221631.34234.paul.moore@hp.com> <20070822.143627.62367286.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , tgraf@suug.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: James Morris Return-path: Received: from atlrel9.hp.com ([156.153.255.214]:50604 "EHLO atlrel9.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934561AbXHVWV0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:21:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, August 22 2007 6:09:36 pm James Morris wrote: > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, David Miller wrote: > > From: Paul Moore > > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:26:36 -0400 > > > > > Was it just a thought, or was there some actual design/code/patchset > > > to go along with it that described the idea? > > > > It was a thought mentioned at the first two netconfs, but it > > went nowhere because the more we discussed the implementation > > the more horrific it began to sound :-) > > Don't forget Rusty's skb reservation patches from 1999... I'm guessing those would probably need to be forward ported just a teensy weensy bit ;) -- paul moore linux security @ hp