netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: jagana@us.ibm.com, billfink@mindspring.com,
	peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	gaagaan@gmail.com, Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, rdreier@cisco.com, mcarlson@broadcom.com,
	jeff@garzik.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org,
	mchan@broadcom.com, tgraf@suug.ch, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru,
	shemminger@linux-foundation.org, kaber@trash.net, sri@us.ibm.com
Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 0/9 Rev3] Implement batching skb API and support in IPoIB
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:25:03 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070824.142503.30177455.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1187957657.4255.35.camel@localhost>

From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:14:16 -0400

> Seems the receive side of the sender is also consuming a lot more cpu
> i suspect because receiver is generating a lot more ACKs with TSO.

I've seen this behavior before on a low cpu powered receiver and the
issue is that batching too much actually hurts a receiver.

If the data packets were better spaced out, the receive would handle
the load better.

This is the thing the TOE guys keep talking about overcoming with
their packet pacing algorithms in their on-card TOE stack.

My hunch is that even if in the non-TSO case the TX packets were all
back to back in the cards TX ring, TSO still spits them out faster on
the wire.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-24 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-17  6:06 [PATCH 0/9 Rev3] Implement batching skb API and support in IPoIB Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-21  7:18 ` David Miller
2007-08-21 12:30   ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-08-21 18:51     ` David Miller
2007-08-21 21:09       ` jamal
2007-08-21 22:50         ` David Miller
2007-08-22  4:11       ` [ofa-general] " Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-22  4:22         ` David Miller
2007-08-22  7:03           ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-22  9:14             ` David Miller
2007-08-23  2:43               ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-22 17:09           ` [ofa-general] " Rick Jones
2007-08-22 20:21             ` David Miller
2007-08-23 22:04               ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-08-23 22:25                 ` jamal
2007-08-23 22:35                   ` [ofa-general] " Rick Jones
2007-08-23 22:41                     ` jamal
2007-08-24  3:18                     ` Bill Fink
2007-08-24 12:14                       ` jamal
2007-08-24 18:08                         ` Bill Fink
2007-08-24 21:25                         ` David Miller [this message]
2007-08-24 23:11                           ` Herbert Xu
2007-08-25 23:45                             ` Bill Fink
2007-08-24 18:46                       ` [ofa-general] " Rick Jones
2007-08-25  0:42                       ` John Heffner
2007-08-26  8:41                         ` [ofa-general] " Bill Fink
2007-08-27  1:32                           ` John Heffner
2007-08-27  2:04                             ` David Miller
2007-08-27 23:23                               ` jamal
2007-09-14  7:20                                 ` [ofa-general] " Bill Fink
2007-09-14 13:44                                   ` TSO, TCP Cong control etc jamal
2007-09-14 17:24                                   ` [PATCH 0/9 Rev3] Implement batching skb API and support in IPoIB David Miller
2007-08-23 22:30                 ` David Miller
2007-08-23 22:38                   ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-08-24  3:34                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-08-24 12:36                       ` jamal
2007-08-24 16:25                       ` Rick Jones
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-08  9:31 [ofa-general] " Krishna Kumar
2007-08-08 10:49 ` [ofa-general] " David Miller
2007-08-08 11:09   ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-08 22:01     ` [ofa-general] " David Miller
2007-08-09  4:19       ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-08 13:42   ` Herbert Xu
2007-08-08 15:14     ` jamal
2007-08-08 20:55       ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-08-08 22:40         ` jamal
2007-08-08 22:22       ` David Miller
2007-08-08 22:53         ` jamal
2007-08-09  3:19     ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-08-14  9:02   ` Krishna Kumar2

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070824.142503.30177455.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
    --cc=billfink@mindspring.com \
    --cc=gaagaan@gmail.com \
    --cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jagana@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
    --cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).