netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: dlezcano@fr.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/1][RFC] add a private field to the sock structure
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:26:20 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070831112620.GA2532@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070830.224049.35665219.davem@davemloft.net>

Em Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:40:49PM -0700, David Miller escreveu:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:18:31 -0300
> 
> > Nah, it still there, sk_protinfo, its just ax25 that uses it
> > (nudge(Ralf)). How do we state that a struct field is deprecated and
> > will be removed soon(tm)?
> 
> You get rid of all the in-tree users and then just kill it :)
> 
> More seriously, I don't think we need a deprecation schedule
> for a struct member, either it's not used in-tree anymore or
> it isn't.  We'll go crazy with any other policy and it's
> difficult enough shrinking these things :-)

OK, I think its enough to say to dlezcano that he should avoid using
sk_protinfo, as soon as we do the work on AX.25 sk_protinfo will be
removed.

- Arnaldo

      reply	other threads:[~2007-08-31 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-29 16:41 [patch 0/1][RFC] add a private field to the sock structure dlezcano
2007-08-29 16:41 ` [patch 1/1][RFC] " dlezcano
2007-08-29 18:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-29 18:23 ` [patch 0/1][RFC] " David Miller
2007-08-29 19:18   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-08-29 21:15     ` Daniel Lezcano
2007-08-31  5:40     ` David Miller
2007-08-31 11:26       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070831112620.GA2532@ghostprotocols.net \
    --to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).