From: Bill Fink <billfink@mindspring.com>
To: jdb@comx.dk
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]: [NET_SCHED]: Make all rate based scheduler work with TSO.
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:59:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070905235954.a2b4e3d2.billfink@mindspring.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1188983830.16405.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 13:40 -0400, Bill Fink wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Sep 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >
> > > Bill Fink wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > >
> > > Yes, you need to specify the MTU on the command line for
> > > jumbo frames.
> >
> > Thanks! Works much better now, although it does slightly exceed
> > the specified rate.
>
> Thats what happens, with the current rate table system, as we use the
> lower boundry (when doing the packet to time lookups). Especially with a
> high MTU, as the "resolution" of the rate table diminish (mpu=9000 gives
> cell_log=6, 2^6=64 bytes "resolution" buckets).
>
> > [root@lang4 ~]# tc qdisc add dev eth2 root tbf rate 2gbit buffer 5000000 limit 18000 mtu 9000
> >
> > [root@lang4 ~]# ./nuttcp-5.5.5 -w10m 192.168.88.14
> > 2465.6729 MB / 10.08 sec = 2051.8241 Mbps 19 %TX 13 %RX
That doesn't seem to account for the magnitude of the rate exceeding.
In the worst case (rough calculation):
(1+64/9000)*2000 = 2014.2222 Mbps
Now if that were 256 rather than 64:
(1+256/9000)*2000 = 2056.8888 Mbps
Or maybe the packet overhead is calculated wrong for the 9000 MTU case
(just wild speculation on my part).
-Bill
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-06 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-31 12:22 [PATCH 1/2]: [NET_SCHED]: Make all rate based scheduler work with TSO Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2007-09-01 7:09 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-01 21:38 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2007-09-04 3:34 ` Bill Fink
2007-09-04 16:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-09-04 17:40 ` Bill Fink
2007-09-05 9:17 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2007-09-06 3:59 ` Bill Fink [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070905235954.a2b4e3d2.billfink@mindspring.com \
--to=billfink@mindspring.com \
--cc=hawk@diku.dk \
--cc=jdb@comx.dk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).