From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic: ifconfig/0x00000002/4170 Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:20:08 +0800 Message-ID: <20070906082008.GA21929@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20070902184439.GA14306@paradigm.rfc822.org> <6bffcb0e0709021659o3856cd06gabc054c949a84397@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Florian Lohoff , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Netdev , linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Michal Piotrowski , ipw3945-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, yi.zhu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org To: Satyam Sharma Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:32:33AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > Probably tangential, but Herbert, is the call to synchronize_rcu() in > dev_deactivate() really correct? Yes it's still correct as of today's tree. Of course patches such as preemptible RCU may change things but they'll need to audit this anyway. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt