From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: RAISCH@de.ibm.com
Cc: THEMANN@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
ossthema@linux.vnet.ibm.com, shemminger@linux-foundation.org,
ARNDB@de.ibm.com, pmac@au1.ibm.com, ellerman@au1.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: new NAPI interface broken for POWER architecture?
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:27:32 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070912.062732.68054135.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF2D6ED296.BDB04FBF-ONC1257354.00473703-C1257354.0048406C@de.ibm.com>
From: Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:10:08 +0200
> This is definitely not something we can change in the HEA device driver
> alone.
And it shouldn't be, x86 implements the policy in irq balance
daemon, powerpc should do it wherever it would be appropriate
there.
> Paul, Michael, Arndt, what is your opinion here?
I'm all ears too :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-12 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-07 9:37 new NAPI interface broken Jan-Bernd Themann
2007-09-12 12:50 ` David Miller
2007-09-12 13:10 ` new NAPI interface broken for POWER architecture? Christoph Raisch
2007-09-12 13:27 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-09-12 15:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-10-16 7:29 ` new NAPI interface broken Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16 7:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16 7:44 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 8:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16 8:31 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 9:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16 21:01 ` Anton Blanchard
2007-10-17 15:26 ` Christoph Raisch
2007-10-16 15:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-09-14 22:12 ` David Miller
2007-09-18 16:15 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2007-09-18 19:08 ` David Miller
2007-09-19 15:33 ` Roland Dreier
2007-09-19 15:43 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070912.062732.68054135.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ARNDB@de.ibm.com \
--cc=RAISCH@de.ibm.com \
--cc=THEMANN@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ellerman@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ossthema@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmac@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).