From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com
Cc: containers@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
htejun@gmail.com, gregkh@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Network Namespace status
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 15:36:43 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070916.153643.13760549.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m18x7a5qif.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:12:08 -0600
> The final blocker to having multiple useful instances of network
> namespaces is the loopback device. We recognize the network namespace
> of incoming packets by looking at dev->nd_net. Which means for
> packets to properly loopback within a network namespace we need a
> loopback device per network namespace. There were some concerns
> expressed when we posted the cleanup part of the patches that allowed
> for multiple loopback devices a few weeks ago so resolving this one
> may be tricky.
There was a change posted recently to dynamically allocate the
loopback device. I like that (sorry I don't have a reference
to the patch handy), and you can build on top of that to get
the namespace local loopback objects you want.
static struct net_device *loopback_dev(struct net_namespace *net)
{
...
}
You get the idea.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-16 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-13 19:12 Network Namespace status Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-14 6:03 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2007-09-14 9:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-16 22:36 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-09-16 23:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-15 15:31 Network namespace status Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070916.153643.13760549.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).