From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 0/2] Add RCU locking to SCTPaddress management Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 16:01:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070916.160102.54198849.davem@davemloft.net> References: <11897120771278-git-send-email-vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, lksctp@hp.com To: vladislav.yasevich@hp.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-98-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.98]:40327 "EHLO picasso.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751998AbXIPXBE (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:01:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <11897120771278-git-send-email-vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Vlad Yasevich Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:34:35 -0400 > Thanks to Sridhar Samudral and Paul McKenney for all the help and comments. > I think this is a final version, unless someone else can spot more problems. > I've ran this under heavy load and it the patches behaves well. > > I think patch 1 is a candidate for 2.6.23 since it fixes a bug, but splitting > these seems a bit odd to me. I'll leave it to DaveM to decide where to > put them. Since you tested this well, I've decided to put both of these patches into net-2.6 I agree it's stupid to split them up. There'll be some merge hassles when I rebase net-2.6.24, but that tree is such a monster that this is inevitable for every bug fix I queue up for 2.6.23 :-)