From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: net-2.6.24 plans Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:22:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070917.092238.78709262.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20070916.202258.03371690.davem@davemloft.net> <46EDFE40.5060306@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: jeff@garzik.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:59141 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752027AbXIQQWj (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:22:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46EDFE40.5060306@garzik.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Jeff Garzik Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:10:40 -0400 > David Miller wrote: > > We've touched so much in net-2.6.24 that we really should be auditing > > the thing and fixing any bugs that have been added. If you're bored > > and looking for something to do, pick an odd NAPI driver and audit it > > in the net-2.6.24 tree. > > You could try that weird "post patches on the list" thing for review. > > I dunno about sparc64, but IMO any networking work you do yourself and > commit yourself should also be sent to the list for review. I sent every single revision of the NAPI struct patch to netdev Jeff.