From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: pjwaskiewicz@gmail.com
Cc: dlezcano@fr.ibm.com, shemminger@linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
containers@lists.osdl.org, benjamin.thery@bull.net
Subject: Re: [net-2.6.24][patch 2/2] Dynamically allocate the loopback device
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:53:49 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070917.185349.98863851.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <224b7d320709171212o66734847kbd17efa817b482fc@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Peter Waskiewicz" <pjwaskiewicz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:12:24 -0700
> This would be a good opportunity to remove the single-allocated queue struct
> in netdevice (at the bottom) that we had to put in to accomodate the static
> loopback. Now we can set it back to a zero element list, and have
> alloc_netdev_mq() just allocate the number of queues requested, not
> num_queues - 1.
>
> I'll put a patch together based on this patchset.
Thanks Peter.
I'll also let this sit so that Eric can provide any feedback
he wants and also figure out how he will use this for the
namespace stuff.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-18 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-17 13:45 [net-2.6.24][patch 0/2] Dynamically allocate the loopback dlezcano
2007-09-17 13:45 ` [net-2.6.24][patch 1/2] Dynamically allocate the loopback device - mindless changes dlezcano
2007-09-17 13:45 ` [net-2.6.24][patch 2/2] Dynamically allocate the loopback device dlezcano
2007-09-17 17:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-09-17 18:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <46EECCD5.5090601-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-09-17 19:12 ` Peter Waskiewicz
2007-09-18 1:53 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-09-18 2:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-09-26 2:24 ` David Miller
2007-09-26 21:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070917.185349.98863851.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=benjamin.thery@bull.net \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pjwaskiewicz@gmail.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).