Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: new NAPI quota synchronization issue
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:01:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070919150129.7b0967f7@freepuppy.rosehill.hemminger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070919.103508.59469052.davem@davemloft.net>

On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> > Probably a good way to deal with this is to simply make the quota
> > handling stateless.
> > 
> > The only reason we handle partial quota usage is to handle the
> > global netdev_budget.  But we can simply "round up" and let
> > netdev_budget get oversubscribed by one napi->quota's worth
> > if necessary.
> > 
> > At that point, n->quota only holds two states when used, full
> > and empty.  And at that point there is no reason to maintain
> > it's value at all.  Only the weight is necessary.
> > 
> > I'll try to post a patch which implements this later today.
> 
> Ok, here is the patch and I've checked it into net-2.6.24 as well.
> 
> There really shouldn't be any fundamental synchronization issues
> in the new NAPI stuff any longer.  I'm pretty sure any problems
> remaining can only be caused by drivers bugs but we'll see :-)
> 
> I went over the list handling several times and it looks bulletproof.
> Only the thread of control that sets the NAPI_STATE_SCHED bit
> atomically will do list modifications, until the thread of control
> that decides unconditionally to clear the bit, which will do a
> list_del() immediately before clearing that bit.
> 
> 

There might be a future problem if some driver decided to change weight
often on the fly?  Perhaps you need to sample it once in start of napi_schedule.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-19 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-19 16:58 new NAPI quota synchronization issue David Miller
2007-09-19 17:35 ` David Miller
2007-09-19 22:01   ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2007-09-19 22:10     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070919150129.7b0967f7@freepuppy.rosehill.hemminger.net \
    --to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox