From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:40:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20070919194050.GE18707@one.firstfloor.org> References: <46F13E8B.4050309@redhat.com> <46F15305.2030507@redhat.com> <20070919172653.GB18045@one.firstfloor.org> <46F1608E.7060908@redhat.com> <20070919175700.GC18045@one.firstfloor.org> <46F16418.3070706@redhat.com> <20070919183004.GA18707@one.firstfloor.org> <46F16CC1.9090302@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , Ulrich Drepper , netdev , Linux Kernel To: Rick Jones Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:50120 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751174AbXISTkw (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:40:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46F16CC1.9090302@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > It has hung-on in various places (stacks) as an "accepted" broadcast IP > in the receive path, but not the send path for quite possibly decades now. Well it is valid in Linux for sending. And who knows who relies on it. -Andi