From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Please pull 'rt2x00' branch of wireless-2.6
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:58:29 +0200
Message-ID: <200709192058.29323.IvDoorn@gmail.com>
References: <20070918213202.GJ4940@tuxdriver.com> <200709192048.00741.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <200709192036.59443.mb@bu3sch.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>, linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org,
	jeff-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Michael Buesch <mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <200709192036.59443.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 September 2007 20:47:59 Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 September 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:31:19 +0200
> > > 
> > > > Because I am indeed not really happy with this early merge, but I'll do my
> > > > best to resolve the last outstanding bugs as soon as possible.
> > > 
> > > Relax :-)
> > 
> > :)
> > 
> > > A merge upstream doesn't mean "bug free", it means "significantly
> > > better than no driver at all" and that is undoubtedly the case
> > > here.
> > 
> > Well I am happy rt2x00 is being considered good enough for upstream already,
> > but I have the habbit of wanting things bug-free before pushing it further upstream.
> > 
> > Well most users are happy with current rt2x00 version anyway,
> > so the remaining issues probably aren't that big anyway. (Except for the 2 panics,
> > which should be resolved soon anyway) ;)
> 
> Well, you have nothing to lose, basically.
> It's impossible for you to create a regression.
> So everything is fine, even if it's buggy and doesn't
> work at all. ;)

Hehe. Thanks. I'll keep that in mind. ;)

Ivo