From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] [TCP]: Maintain highest_sack accurately to the highest skb Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:29:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070920.112912.04442227.davem@davemloft.net> References: <11902906724088-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> <11902906721846-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57160 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752042AbXITS3M convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:29:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <11902906721846-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org =46rom: "Ilpo_J=E4rvinen" Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:17:44 +0300 > In general, it should not be necessary to call tcp_fragment for > already SACKed skbs, but it's better to be safe than sorry. And > indeed, it can be called from sacktag when a DSACK arrives or > some ACK (with SACK) reordering occurs (sacktag could be made > to avoid the call in the latter case though I'm not sure if it's > worth of the trouble and added complexity to cover such marginal > case). >=20 > The collapse case has return for SACKED_ACKED case earlier, so > just WARN_ON if internal inconsistency is detected for some > reason. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Ilpo J=E4rvinen Applied, thanks Ilpo.