From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: bind and O_NONBLOCK
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 22:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20070922.225818.74741259.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <46F540F2.1090109@redhat.com>
	<20070922165938.GA11234@2ka.mipt.ru>
	<46F54CA5.8020200@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alan@redhat.com
To: drepper@redhat.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:44919
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752878AbXIWF6S (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:58:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <46F54CA5.8020200@redhat.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:11:01 -0700

> There was no public mail.  I asked RH engineering for proposals for
> changes to the POSIX spec and Alan replied.

Please do not discuss such proposals only privately, especially when
the ramifications affect the entire community.

It is important the things get hashed out on a public forum where
all networking developers can add their insight into the problem.