From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] CAN: Add PF_CAN core module Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:07:09 -0700 Message-ID: <20070925140709.0b9e78f8@fujitsu-loaner> References: <20070925122029.15989.0@janus.isnogud.escape.de> <20070925122243.15989.2@janus.isnogud.escape.de> <20070925124138.GC18348@ghostprotocols.net> <20070925083303.6c1f7701@freepuppy.rosehill> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , Patrick McHardy , Joe Perches , Thomas Gleixner , Oliver Hartkopp , Oliver Hartkopp To: Urs Thuermann Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:56047 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752230AbXIYVIg (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:08:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 25 Sep 2007 23:00:15 +0200 Urs Thuermann wrote: > Stephen Hemminger writes: > > > Then please make all exported symbols marked EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL to > > make sure that the other CAN protocol can not reuse your > > infrastructure. > > We don't want to force other CAN protocol implementations to be GPL > also. AFAIR from discussions on LKML, it was mostly agreed upon that > this decision is up to the authors of code. > > urs I just don't want proprietary drivers extensions in linux kernel. EXPORT_SYMBOL has no meaning in other OS environments.