From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ? Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:18:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20070926181829.GC512@redhat.com> References: <20070926150447.GA3761@redhat.com> <46FAA083.9020604@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "Kok, Auke" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:45440 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755140AbXIZSSd (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:18:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46FAA083.9020604@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:10:11AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > Last night, I hit this bug during boot up.. > > http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100-2.jpg > > > > This morning, I got a mail from a Fedora user of the same > > .23-rc8 based kernel that has seen a different trace > > also implicating e100.. > > > > http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100.jpg > > > > It may be that the two problems are unrelated, and it's > > just coincidence that both reports happen to be on an e100, > > but the timing is odd. Have there been other reports > > of similar problems recently ? > > there hasn't been a change to e100 in two months now - perhaps something slipped > into the stack that broke it? If this reproduces, could you bisect? Yeah, I notice only 3 changes to e100 since .22 I'll see if I can reproduce the first one and bisect. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk