From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add network namespace clone & unshare support. Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:28:42 -0700 Message-ID: <20070928022842.8f408d71.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <46FB6F1E.8070105@fr.ibm.com> <20070927.124552.69400277.davem@davemloft.net> <46FCC56D.9050600@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , David Miller , containers@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Cedric Le Goater Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:50099 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758054AbXI1J2v (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 05:28:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46FCC56D.9050600@fr.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:12:13 +0200 Cedric Le Goater wrote: > > Cedric made a good point that we will have conflicts of code > > being added to the same place in nsproxy.c and the like. So > > I copied Andrew to give him a heads up. > > here's a suggestion, > > we could keep the net namespace unshare patch out of david's tree, > let andrew merge and release a new -mm and, then, send the net namespace > unshare patch to andrew. that should keep nsproxy out of the andrew's > merge challenge. But david's tree will miss the unshare part for a while. This patch only generates two rejects against the current -mm poop pile. That's insignificant. We don't need to do anything special to merge a little patch like this one.