From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1][TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:20:59 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20071001.222059.11266966.yoshfuji@st-paulia.net> References: <200710011332.43657@strip-the-willow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org To: gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk Return-path: Received: from sapphire.linux-ipv6.org ([203.178.140.14]:52773 "EHLO sapphire.st-paulia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752111AbXJANwy (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:52:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200710011332.43657@strip-the-willow> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org In article <200710011332.43657@strip-the-willow> (at Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:32:43 +0100), Gerrit Renker says: > [TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement > > Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker > --- > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c > @@ -3129,6 +3129,7 @@ static void tcp_reset(struct sock *sk) > return; > default: > sk->sk_err = ECONNRESET; > + break; > } > > if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) NAK; it is not required at all. --yoshfuji