From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerrit Renker Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1][TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:02:10 +0100 Message-ID: <200710011402.10377@strip-the-willow> References: <200710011332.43657@strip-the-willow> <20071001123430.GZ8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Return-path: Received: from dee.erg.abdn.ac.uk ([139.133.204.82]:49574 "EHLO erg.abdn.ac.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751328AbXJANCG (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:02:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20071001123430.GZ8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Quoting Al Viro: | On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:32:43PM +0100, Gerrit Renker wrote: | > [TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement | > | > Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker | > --- | > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | > @@ -3129,6 +3129,7 @@ static void tcp_reset(struct sock *sk) | > return; | > default: | > sk->sk_err = ECONNRESET; | > + break; | > } | | Huh? Why on the Earth would that be a problem? | | Sorry what is your question?