netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: rick.jones2@hp.com
Cc: lm@bitmover.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, wscott@bitmover.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tcp bw in 2.6
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:32:16 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071002.153216.82129058.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4702C37F.4030601@hp.com>

From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:17:35 -0700

> Stranger still, with a mix of a 2.6.23-rc5ish kernel and a net-2.6.24 one 
> (pulled oh middle of last week?) I get link-rate and I see no asymmetry between 
> TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS over an "e1000" link with no switch or tg3 with a 
> ProCurve on my rx2660's.
> 
> I can also run bw_tcp from lmbench 3.0a8 and get 106 MB/s.
> 
> I don't have a netgear switch to try in all this...

I'm starting to have a theory about what the bad case might
be.

A strong sender going to an even stronger receiver which can
pull out packets into the process as fast as they arrive.
This might be part of what keeps the receive window from
growing.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-02 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20070929142517.EC6AB5FB21@work.bitmover.com>
     [not found] ` <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709290914410.3579@woody.linux-foundation.org>
     [not found]   ` <20070929172639.GB7037@bitmover.com>
     [not found]     ` <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709291050200.3579@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-02  0:59       ` tcp bw in 2.6 Larry McVoy
2007-10-02  2:14         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02  2:20           ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02  3:50             ` David Miller
2007-10-02  4:23               ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 15:06             ` John Heffner
2007-10-02 17:14             ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 17:20               ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 18:01                 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 18:40                   ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 19:47                     ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 21:32                     ` David Miller
2007-10-03  7:19               ` Bill Fink
2007-10-02 10:52         ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-02 15:09           ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 15:41             ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 16:25               ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 16:47                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 16:49                   ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 17:10                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-15 12:40                   ` Daniel Schaffrath
2007-10-15 15:49                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 16:34               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 16:48                 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 21:16                   ` David Miller
2007-10-02 21:26                     ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 21:47                       ` David Miller
2007-10-02 22:17                         ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 22:32                           ` David Miller [this message]
2007-10-02 22:36                             ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 22:59                               ` Rick Jones
2007-10-03  8:02                               ` David Miller
2007-10-02 16:48               ` Ben Greear
2007-10-02 17:11                 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 17:18                   ` Ben Greear
2007-10-02 17:21                     ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 17:54                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 18:35                         ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 18:29             ` John Heffner
2007-10-02 19:07               ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 19:29                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 20:31                   ` David Miller
2007-10-02 19:33                 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 19:53                   ` John Heffner
2007-10-02 20:14                     ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 20:40                       ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 20:42                       ` Wayne Scott
2007-10-02 21:56                         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 19:27             ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 19:53               ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 20:33               ` David Miller
2007-10-02 20:44                 ` Roland Dreier
2007-10-02 21:21                 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-03 21:13                   ` Pekka Pietikainen
2007-10-03 21:23                     ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-03 21:50                       ` Pekka Pietikainen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071002.153216.82129058.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wscott@bitmover.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).