From: lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy)
To: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>
Cc: lm@bitmover.com, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net,
wscott@bitmover.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tcp bw in 2.6
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:07:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071002190742.GC29944@bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47028DEF.5070009@psc.edu>
> Looks like you have TSO enabled. Does it behave differently if it's
> disabled?
It cranks the interrupts/sec up to 8K instead of 5K. No difference in
performance other than that.
> I think Rick Jones is on to something with the HP ack avoidance.
I sincerely doubt it. I'm only using the HP box because it has gigabit
so it's a single connection. I can produce almost identical results by
doing the same sorts of tests with several linux clients. One direction
goes fast and the other goes slow.
3x performance difference depending on the direction of data flow:
# Server is receiving, goes fast
$ for i in 22 24 25 26; do rsh -n glibc$i dd if=/dev/zero|dd of=/dev/null & done
load free cach swap pgin pgou dk0 dk1 dk2 dk3 ipkt opkt int ctx usr sys idl
0.98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30K 15K 8.1K 68K 12 66 22
0.98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29K 15K 8.2K 67K 11 64 25
0.98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29K 15K 8.2K 67K 12 66 22
# Server is sending, goes slow
$ for i in 22 24 25 26; do dd if=/dev/zero|rsh glibc$i dd of=/dev/null & done
load free cach swap pgin pgou dk0 dk1 dk2 dk3 ipkt opkt int ctx usr sys idl
1.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.0K 10K 4.4K 8.4K 21 17 62
0.97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.1K 10K 4.4K 8.9K 2 15 83
0.97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.0K 10K 4.4K 8.6K 21 26 53
$ for i in 22 24 25 26; do rsh glibc$i cat /etc/motd; done | grep Welcome
Welcome to redhat71.bitmover.com, a 2Ghz Athlon running Red Hat 7.1.
Welcome to glibc24.bitmover.com, a 1.2Ghz Athlon running SUSE 10.1.
Welcome to glibc25.bitmover.com, a 2Ghz Athlon running Fedora Core 6
Welcome to glibc26.bitmover.com, a 2Ghz Athlon running Fedora Core 7
$ for i in 22 24 25 26; do rsh glibc$i uname -r; done
2.4.2-2
2.6.16.13-4-default
2.6.18-1.2798.fc6
2.6.22.4-65.fc7
No HP in the mix. It's got nothing to do with hp, nor to do with rsh, it
has everything to do with the direction the data is flowing.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-02 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070929142517.EC6AB5FB21@work.bitmover.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709290914410.3579@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20070929172639.GB7037@bitmover.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709291050200.3579@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-02 0:59 ` tcp bw in 2.6 Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 2:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 2:20 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 3:50 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 4:23 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 15:06 ` John Heffner
2007-10-02 17:14 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 17:20 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 18:01 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 18:40 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 19:47 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 21:32 ` David Miller
2007-10-03 7:19 ` Bill Fink
2007-10-02 10:52 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-02 15:09 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 15:41 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 16:25 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 16:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 16:49 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 17:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-15 12:40 ` Daniel Schaffrath
2007-10-15 15:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 16:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 16:48 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 21:16 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 21:26 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 21:47 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 22:17 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 22:32 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 22:36 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 22:59 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-03 8:02 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 16:48 ` Ben Greear
2007-10-02 17:11 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 17:18 ` Ben Greear
2007-10-02 17:21 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 17:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-02 18:35 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 18:29 ` John Heffner
2007-10-02 19:07 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2007-10-02 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 20:31 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 19:33 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 19:53 ` John Heffner
2007-10-02 20:14 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-02 20:40 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 20:42 ` Wayne Scott
2007-10-02 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-02 19:53 ` Rick Jones
2007-10-02 20:33 ` David Miller
2007-10-02 20:44 ` Roland Dreier
2007-10-02 21:21 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-03 21:13 ` Pekka Pietikainen
2007-10-03 21:23 ` Larry McVoy
2007-10-03 21:50 ` Pekka Pietikainen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071002190742.GC29944@bitmover.com \
--to=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jheffner@psc.edu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wscott@bitmover.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).