From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] TCP: fix lost retransmit detection
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20071006.231714.41173786.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20071004.184519.16476818.takano@axe-inc.co.jp>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710041419560.31129@kivilampi-30.cs.helsinki.fi>
	<20071007.145100.00679926.takano@axe-inc.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	y-kodama@aist.go.jp
To: takano@axe-inc.co.jp
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:38986
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751353AbXJGGRP (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 7 Oct 2007 02:17:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20071007.145100.00679926.takano@axe-inc.co.jp>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: TAKANO Ryousei <takano@axe-inc.co.jp>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 14:51:00 +0900 (JST)

> BTW, what is difference among netdev-2.6, net-2.6 (net-2.6.24), and 
> tcp-2.6? I am not familiar with linux kernel development process.

net-2.6.24 tree is current new development

net-2.6 tree is only bug fixes

tcp-2.6 is an old abandonded tree that holds lots of old
TCP work, most of which is merged already, but one part
(my RB-Tree SACK patches) are not integrated yet.