From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] do not give access to 1-1024 ports for autobinding Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:41:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20071010084137.1963122e@freepuppy.rosehill> References: <20071010143449.GA10796@iris.sw.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, den@openvz.org To: "Denis V. Lunev" Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:37716 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754789AbXJJPlx (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:41:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20071010143449.GA10796@iris.sw.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:34:49 +0400 "Denis V. Lunev" wrote: > This patch prevents possibility to give 1-1024 port range for autobinding. > {1, 1} may only takes some sense for deep embedded people. > > Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev > > --- ./net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c.port2 2007-10-10 17:46:48.000000000 +0400 > +++ ./net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c 2007-10-10 18:08:00.000000000 +0400 > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ extern int sysctl_ip_nonlocal_bind; > #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL > static int zero; > static int tcp_retr1_max = 255; > -static int ip_local_port_range_min[] = { 1, 1 }; > +static int ip_local_port_range_min[] = { 1024, 1024 }; > static int ip_local_port_range_max[] = { 65535, 65535 }; > #endif > > - That only limits the sysctl, which seems completely counter productive. Sounds like more of the "stop root from shooting themselves" patches. -- Stephen Hemminger