From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Denys" Subject: Re: Possible 2.6.22 -> 2.6.23 HTB regression? Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:20:38 +0300 Message-ID: <20071010132039.M920@visp.net.lb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: kaber@trash.net, hadi@cyberus.ca To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from usermail.globalproof.net ([194.146.153.18]:47845 "EHLO usermail.globalproof.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752461AbXJJNcJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:32:09 -0400 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org I did complete reboot(without kexec) to 2.6.23 (same configuration) and seems it is working better (not stuck as before to 60-70Mbit/s). On all cases current_clocksources was hpet, just i tried to change it (doesnt help at all). visp-1 ~ # cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/ current_clocksource hpet visp-1 ~ # cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/ available_clocksource hpet acpi_pm jiffies tsc from pcap analyser i wrote (just filter by expression "ip" counting bytes on eth0.1000): 82957/82957 KBit/S (53092530/53092530) (3887135786/3889389904) 82931/82931 KBit/S (53076469/53076469) (3940228316/3942482434) 82965/82965 KBit/S (53097615/53097615) (3993304785/3995558903) 82946/82946 KBit/S (53085988/53085988) (4046402400/4048656518) 82867/82867 KBit/S (53035341/53035341) (4099488388/4101742506) 82941/82941 KBit/S (53082260/53082260) (4152523729/4154777847) 82952/82952 KBit/S (53089348/53089348) (4205605989/4207860107) 82948/82945 KBit/S (53086915/53085415) (4258695337/4260949455) visp-1 ~ # cat /proc/net/psched 000003e8 00000400 000f4240 3b9aca00 How i can help more? -- Denys Fedoryshchenko Technical Manager Virtual ISP S.A.L.