From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Virtual Netdevice
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20071017.223411.57445764.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <13230720.post@talk.nabble.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: ashokrajjb@gmail.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34427
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751182AbXJRFeN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:34:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <13230720.post@talk.nabble.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: rajashok <ashokrajjb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:10:43 -0700 (PDT)

> we are trying to to integrate our ipsec onto linux 2.6 kernel

Why not use the already existing 2.6.x kernel IPSEC stack?
It works quite well.

And for this reason, it is unlikely you will get much help
on these mailing lists in your efforts to replace it with
your own. :-)