From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] remove netpoll receive code
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:25:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071018082501.2f7023fd@freepuppy.rosehill> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071018000244.2513c564.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:02:44 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:28:38 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:21:31 -0700
> >
> > > I propose that we take out all the whole netpoll rx path. If/when
> > > kgdb gets submitted a better and alternative receive path can be
> > > added.
> >
> > I would like to kill the RX side handling of netpoll too,
> > but I don't think that's reasonable as kgdb is actively
> > being pushed for 2.6.25 inclusion.
> >
> > Andrew is likely to add it to his -mm tree soon and therefore kgdb
> > will need to work properly now.
>
> git-kgdb.patch has been in there for ages - maybe a year. Although I
> disabled it a week or so ago due to the sheer number of rejects. Will
> bring it back when things settle down a bit.
>
> > The RX netpoll thing has a long precedence, it's been in the tree for
> > a long time, so we are in some ways stuck with it until we have a
> > complete replacement facility. That means we can't yank it out first
> > and implement the replacement later.
How about I work on a better/alternative receive path for kgdb that
can be applied after kgdb is included. Kgdb could actually be useful
for me :-)
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-18 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-17 20:21 [RFC] remove netpoll receive code Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-17 20:41 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-18 3:52 ` Jason Wessel
2007-10-18 6:28 ` David Miller
2007-10-18 7:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-18 15:25 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2007-10-22 16:54 ` Matt Mackall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071018082501.2f7023fd@freepuppy.rosehill \
--to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox