From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix race between sk_filter reassign and sk_clone() Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20071019.005245.77429272.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20071019022947.GA29560@lixom.net> <20071018.215521.28810637.davem@davemloft.net> <47185E9E.1030102@openvz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: olof@lixom.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: xemul@openvz.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50782 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750916AbXJSHwc (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:52:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47185E9E.1030102@openvz.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Pavel Emelyanov Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:37:02 +0400 > David Miller wrote: > > From: Olof Johansson > > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:29:47 -0500 > > > >> So, looks like rcu_dereference() returned NULL. I don't know the > >> filter code at all, but it seems like it might be a valid case? > >> sk_detach_filter() seems to handle a NULL sk_filter, at least. > >> > >> > >> So, this needs review by someone who knows the filter, but it fixes the > >> problem for me: > > Yes. The NULL filter is a valid case, when there are no > filters attached at all. So this fix is correct. > > Thanks, Olof. Sorry, Dave :( No worries, thanks for reviewing.