From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:01:16 +0200
Message-ID: <20071019080116.GA2578@ff.dom.local>
References: <20071015125301.GC3015@ff.dom.local> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0710151737250.16262@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20071016062108.GB1000@ff.dom.local> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0710161759050.22596@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20071017085809.GA1658@ff.dom.local> <20071018063157.GA1694@ff.dom.local> <20071018070531.GA2065@ff.dom.local> <20071018154819.GA425@tv-sign.ru> <20071019075014.GA1765@ff.dom.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "Maciej W\. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
	Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.go2.pl ([193.17.41.42]:54573 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S967114AbXJSH6N (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:58:13 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071019075014.GA1765@ff.dom.local>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> sched_work_sync() with rtnl_lock(). It's only less probable to lockup
> with this than with flush_schedule_work().

...But, not much less...

Jarek P.