netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: joe@perches.com
Cc: acme@ghostprotocols.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - trivial - Improve appletalk checksum calculation
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:35:45 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071022.173545.74561992.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193081779.5132.24.camel@localhost>

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:36:19 -0700

> It's a bit after 2.6.1 now...
> 
> Removes unnecessary if, uses 16 bit rotate left.
> Performance improves ~30%
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>

I'm not sure your transformation is equivalent.  Did you
actually test this with appletalk traffic to make sure
the sum is computed correctly?  Or more simply, did you
write a test program to send some test data through the
old and new functions?

Here is what I think the problem is:

>  static unsigned long atalk_sum_partial(const unsigned char *data,
>  				       int len, unsigned long sum)
>  {
> -	/* This ought to be unwrapped neatly. I'll trust gcc for now */
>  	while (len--) {
> -		sum += *data;
> -		sum <<= 1;
> -		if (sum & 0x10000) {
> -			sum++;
> -			sum &= 0xffff;
> -		}
> -		data++;
> +		sum += *data++;
> +		sum = ((sum & 0x8000)>>15) | ((sum & 0x7fff)<<1);
>  	}
>  	return sum;
>  }

The old code is handling overflow, so that when bit 16 gets set by and
addition, that overflow bit gets cleared and then added back into the
sum.

Your code is rotating bit 15 down by one bit and bits 0-14 up by one
bit, my remedial math knowledge tell me that's likely not the same
thing. :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-23  0:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-22 19:36 [PATCH] - trivial - Improve appletalk checksum calculation Joe Perches
2007-10-23  0:35 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-10-23  1:36   ` Joe Perches
2007-10-23  1:43     ` David Miller
2007-10-23  1:53       ` Joe Perches
2007-10-23  3:51         ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-28 20:18           ` Urs Thuermann
2007-10-28 21:01             ` Joe Perches
2007-10-29  2:40               ` Joe Perches
2007-10-23  3:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-23  3:39   ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071022.173545.74561992.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).