From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Masahide NAKAMURA Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3][XFRM]: Support packet processing error statistics. Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:42:06 +0900 Message-ID: <200710221742.06137.nakam@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20071017.213523.58458049.davem@davemloft.net> <11930334662094-git-send-email-nakam@linux-ipv6.org> <20071022085040.GA17954@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from [203.178.140.9] ([203.178.140.9]:36587 "EHLO mail.gomagoma.org" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750799AbXJVJDd (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:03:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20071022085040.GA17954@gondor.apana.org.au> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Monday 22 October 2007 17:50, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:11:06PM +0900, Masahide NAKAMURA wrote: > > This patch introduces statistics about transformation error (or almost error) > > factor at packet processing for developer. > > It is not a SNMP/MIB specification from IPsec/MIPv6 but a counter > > designed from current transformation source code. > > > > Comment please. > > Looks fine to me. But could you hold onto this for a few days? > I'm in the process of merging the input paths of IPv4 and IPv6. > Once that's done you'll only need to count things once rather > than once for IPv4 and again for IPv6. No problem, I'll fix my patches upon your work and resend them. Regards, -- Masahide NAKAMURA