From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mchan@broadcom.com, mcarlson@broadcom.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] pci: Export the pci_restore_msi_state() function
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:19:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071022181933.GD4280@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071021.214520.66310568.davem@davemloft.net>
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:45:20PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> The core issue is that the ARCH level MSI code invokes
> write_msi_msg(), not the generic code, exactly because there
> are platform level issues wherein the firmware is the only
> legal way to write the MSI settings in PCI config space.
>
> However, the MSI state restore code was not architected similarly. It
> does the write_msi_msg() directly, instead of letting platform level
> code is in ARCH hooks.
Yes, exactly.
> Therefore I think we need to attack this in two stages:
>
> 1) First changeset moves the write_msi_msg() call currently in
> __pci_restore_msi_state() into an ARCH overridable handler.
>
> This would allow powerpc to deal with this properly.
Yes!
I'll try to put together a patch later today, if I can get
a fabled "round tuit".
> pci_restor_msi_state() can get exported to modules in this
> change
OK.
> 2) The Tigon3 error recovery changes, as they were.
>
> But I have to ask, can anyone see how e1000 handles MSI properly
> in it's PCI error support?
It doesn't. None of them do. :-( I didn't get access to msi-capable
hardware until a few weeks ago; that's why this is coming up just now.
--linas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-22 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-19 21:36 [PATCH 5/7] pci: Export the pci_restore_msi_state() function Matt Carlson
2007-10-19 23:29 ` Linas Vepstas
2007-10-20 0:36 ` Michael Chan
2007-10-20 0:04 ` Linas Vepstas
2007-10-20 0:27 ` David Miller
2007-10-20 0:46 ` [BUG] powerpc does not save msi state [was " Linas Vepstas
2007-10-20 0:53 ` David Miller
2007-10-20 6:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-10-20 22:50 ` Michael Chan
2007-10-21 21:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-22 19:54 ` Linas Vepstas
2007-10-23 0:23 ` David Miller
2007-10-23 0:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-20 1:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-20 1:12 ` Michael Chan
2007-10-20 0:25 ` Linas Vepstas
2007-10-21 23:21 ` David Miller
2007-10-22 1:49 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-10-22 18:13 ` Linas Vepstas
2007-10-22 21:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-23 0:13 ` Linas Vepstas
2007-10-23 0:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-23 4:20 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-10-22 4:01 ` Michael Chan
2007-10-22 4:45 ` David Miller
2007-10-22 18:19 ` Linas Vepstas [this message]
2007-10-22 18:07 ` Linas Vepstas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071022181933.GD4280@austin.ibm.com \
--to=linas@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).