From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: davej@redhat.com
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com, ajax@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add eeprom_bad_csum_allow module option to e1000.
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:53:39 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071023.145339.55504234.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071023212026.GF7793@redhat.com>
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:20:26 -0400
> Indeed. This is a common enough problem that not including it causes
> more pain than its worth. I have two affected boxes myself that I
> actually thought the hardware was dead before I tried ajax's patch.
>
> People aren't going to report this as a bug. They aren't going to
> try out patches, they're going to do what I did and stick another
> network card in the box and go on with life.
>
> Our users deserve better than this.
Seconded. The resistence to this patch is just flat-out rediculious,
just like it was in the e100 case.
And I think all of this "e1000 is different!" talk is merely a
scarecrow for the fact that Intel simply doesn't want this patch
merged for some other reason.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-23 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <11931515302013-git-send-email-ajax@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <471E1ECD.80002@intel.com>
[not found] ` <1193156487.26974.39.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <471E2AD0.1000500@intel.com>
2007-10-23 20:40 ` [PATCH] Add eeprom_bad_csum_allow module option to e1000 Jeff Garzik
2007-10-23 21:01 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-23 21:51 ` David Miller
2007-10-23 21:20 ` Dave Jones
2007-10-23 21:38 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-23 21:53 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-10-23 23:19 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-24 0:55 ` [PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes Jeff Garzik
2007-10-24 1:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-24 1:07 ` David Miller
2007-10-24 2:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-24 2:23 ` David Miller
2007-11-01 18:04 ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-01 18:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-01 18:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-01 19:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-24 1:15 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-23 23:03 ` [PATCH] Add eeprom_bad_csum_allow module option to e1000 Kok, Auke
2007-10-23 23:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-24 5:38 ` Dave Jones
2007-10-23 21:48 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071023.145339.55504234.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ajax@redhat.com \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).