netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: QUESTION: How to fix race between .suspend routine and watchdog timer
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:12:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710250612.44296.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

Recently, trying to fix saa7134 suspend/resume problems I found that there 
is a race between IRQ handler and .suspend , and that I cant let driver access the device
while its in D3 since it can lock up some systems.

Now I am looking to fix those issues in two drivers that have my .suspend/.resume routines.
the saa7134 capture chip and dmfe, the davicom network driver.

Looking through the dmfe code, I noticed yet another possible race.
A race between the .suspend, and a timer that serves both as a watchdog, and link state detector.
Again I need to prevent it from running during the suspend/resume, but how?

I can use del_timer in .suspend, and mod_timer in .resume, but that doesn't protect against
race with already running timer.
I can use del_timer_sync, but it states that it is useless if timer re-enables itself, and I agree with that.
In dmfe case the timer does re-enable itself.

I can put checks in the timer for ->insuspend, and don't re enable it if set,
but that opens a new can of worms with memory barriers, etc...

So please tell me how properly to do that.

By the way, this problem, together with synchronize_irq it very generic, since most drivers
have and irq handler, and a timeout timer.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky

             reply	other threads:[~2007-10-25  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-25  4:12 Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2007-10-25 17:02 ` [linux-pm] QUESTION: How to fix race between .suspend routine and watchdog timer Alan Stern
2007-10-26 11:48   ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-10-27 19:17     ` Alan Stern
2007-10-27 19:19       ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-10-27 22:24         ` Alan Stern
2007-10-28 19:19           ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200710250612.44296.maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --to=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).