From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: dlezcano@fr.ibm.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1][CORE] resend - fix free_netdev on register_netdev failure
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:38:30 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071030.153830.120597346.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071030162059.010348834@mai.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com>
From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:19:26 +0100
> Point 1:
> The unregistering of a network device schedule a netdev_run_todo.
> This function calls dev->destructor when it is set and the
> destructor calls free_netdev.
>
> Point 2:
> In the case of an initialization of a network device the usual code
> is:
> * alloc_netdev
> * register_netdev
> -> if this one fails, call free_netdev and exit with error.
>
> Point 3:
> In the register_netdevice function at the later state, when the device
> is at the registered state, a call to the netdevice_notifiers is made.
> If one of the notification falls into an error, a rollback to the
> registered state is done using unregister_netdevice.
>
> Conclusion:
> When a network device fails to register during initialization because
> one network subsystem returned an error during a notification call
> chain, the network device is freed twice because of fact 1 and fact 2.
> The second free_netdev will be done with an invalid pointer.
>
> Proposed solution:
> The following patch move all the code of unregister_netdevice *except*
> the call to net_set_todo, to a new function "rollback_registered".
>
> The following functions are changed in this way:
> * register_netdevice: calls rollback_registered when a notification fails
> * unregister_netdevice: calls rollback_register + net_set_todo, the call
> order to net_set_todo is changed because it is the
> latest now. Since it justs add an element to a list
> that should not break anything.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Looks good, applied.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-30 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20071030161925.487151276@mai.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com>
2007-10-30 16:19 ` [patch 1/1][CORE] resend - fix free_netdev on register_netdev failure Daniel Lezcano
2007-10-30 22:38 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-10-31 4:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071030.153830.120597346.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox