From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: docbook fixes for netif_ functions
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:36:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071031153620.01cf5eeb.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071031140848.4a425df2@freepuppy.rosehill>
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:08:48 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Documentation updates for network interfaces.
>
> 1. Add doc for netif_napi_add
> 2. Remove doc for unused returns from netif_rx
> 3. Add doc for netif_receive_skb
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
>
> --- a/net/core/dev.c 2007-10-31 09:16:09.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c 2007-10-31 10:00:39.000000000 -0700
> @@ -2001,6 +1998,21 @@ out:
> }
> #endif
>
> +/**
> + * netif_receive_skb - process receive buffer from network
> + * @skb: buffer to process
> + *
> + * netif_receive_skb() is the main receive data processing function.
> + * It always succeeds. The buffer may be dropped during processing
> + * for congestion control or by the protocol layers.
> + *
> + * This function may only be called from softirq context and interrupts
> + * should be enabled.
> + *
> + * return values (usually ignored).
> + * NET_RX_SUCCESS (no congestion)
> + * NET_RX_DROP (packet was dropped)
For the 3 lines above, how about:
* Return values (usually ignored):
* NET_RX_SUCCESS: no congestion
* NET_RX_DROP: packet was dropped
only because they come out of kernel-doc badly, munged together like so:
return values (usually ignored). NET_RX_SUCCESS (no congestion)
NET_RX_DROP (packet was dropped)
> + */
> int netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct packet_type *ptype, *pt_prev;
>
Thanks for doing this patch.
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-31 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-31 21:08 [PATCH] net: docbook fixes for netif_ functions Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-31 22:36 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2007-11-01 9:22 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071031153620.01cf5eeb.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox