From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: docbook fixes for netif_ functions Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20071101.022209.141061101.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20071031140848.4a425df2@freepuppy.rosehill> <20071031153620.01cf5eeb.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: rdunlap@xenotime.net Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56382 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750812AbXKAJWJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:22:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20071031153620.01cf5eeb.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Randy Dunlap Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:36:20 -0700 > > + * return values (usually ignored). > > + * NET_RX_SUCCESS (no congestion) > > + * NET_RX_DROP (packet was dropped) > > For the 3 lines above, how about: > > * Return values (usually ignored): > * NET_RX_SUCCESS: no congestion > * NET_RX_DROP: packet was dropped > > > only because they come out of kernel-doc badly, munged together like so: > > return values (usually ignored). NET_RX_SUCCESS (no congestion) > NET_RX_DROP (packet was dropped) I've applied Stephen's patch with this minor correction added.