From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:35:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20071101.143535.45402283.davem@davemloft.net> References: <47292A99.5070805@linux-foundation.org> <20071031.215025.195350296.davem@davemloft.net> <4729EAFF.9050606@candelatech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@linux-foundation.org, djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bguo@sw.starentnetworks.com To: greearb@candelatech.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50908 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752700AbXKAVfg (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:35:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4729EAFF.9050606@candelatech.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Ben Greear Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 08:04:31 -0700 > David Miller wrote: > > The hardware has stripped the VLAN header completely and has not > > provided it to us at all. > > > Do the NICs not save the QoS bits in the VLAN header anywhere that we could > use to reconstitute the header? You get the 16-bit VLAN tag.