From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device? Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20071101.145956.63020380.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4729EAFF.9050606@candelatech.com> <18218.18134.353553.189622@zeus.sw.starentnetworks.com> <472A49BD.6000802@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com, greearb@candelatech.com, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bguo@sw.starentnetworks.com To: rick.jones2@hp.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:45573 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753143AbXKAV75 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:59:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <472A49BD.6000802@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Rick Jones Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:48:45 -0700 > One could I suppose try to ammend the information passed to allow > tcpdump to say "oh, this was a tx packet on the same machine on > which I am tracing so don't worry about checksum mismatch" We do this already!