netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] netpoll: rx optimization
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 11:43:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071103184338.982195631@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20071103184314.216145305@linux-foundation.org

[-- Attachment #1: netpoll-rx.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3603 bytes --]

This patch makes netpoll work for non-NAPI devices that call
netif_receive_skb. Devices are allowed to call netif_receive_skb
if they are receiving packets in softirq (ie in tasklet).
One side effect of this is that received packets will be looked
at twice for the non-NAPI case, but this is harmless.

Move the locking out of the inline hook and into the internal
function.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>


--- a/include/linux/netpoll.h	2007-11-03 11:05:33.000000000 -0700
+++ b/include/linux/netpoll.h	2007-11-03 11:08:36.000000000 -0700
@@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ struct netpoll_info {
 	struct delayed_work tx_work;
 };
 
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
+
 void netpoll_poll(struct netpoll *np);
 void netpoll_send_udp(struct netpoll *np, const char *msg, int len);
 void netpoll_print_options(const char *prefix, struct netpoll *np);
@@ -38,32 +41,18 @@ int netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np, st
 int netpoll_trap(void);
 void netpoll_set_trap(int trap);
 void netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np);
-int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb);
+bool __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb);
 
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
-static inline int netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
+/* Hijack incoming packet for use by netpoll.
+ * NB: may be called twice for NAPI case
+ */
+static inline bool netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	struct netpoll_info *npinfo = skb->dev->npinfo;
-	unsigned long flags;
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	if (!npinfo || !npinfo->rx_np)
-		return 0;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
-	if (__netpoll_rx(skb))
-		ret = 1;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
+	if (unlikely(skb->dev->npinfo))
+		return __netpoll_rx(skb);
 
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static inline int netpoll_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
-{
-	if (!list_empty(&skb->dev->napi_list))
-		return netpoll_rx(skb);
-	return 0;
+	return false;
 }
 
 static inline void *netpoll_poll_lock(struct napi_struct *napi)
--- a/net/core/dev.c	2007-11-03 11:05:33.000000000 -0700
+++ b/net/core/dev.c	2007-11-03 11:08:36.000000000 -0700
@@ -2020,8 +2020,7 @@ int netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *sk
 	int ret = NET_RX_DROP;
 	__be16 type;
 
-	/* if we've gotten here through NAPI, check netpoll */
-	if (netpoll_receive_skb(skb))
+	if (netpoll_rx(skb))
 		return NET_RX_DROP;
 
 	if (!skb->tstamp.tv64)
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c	2007-11-03 11:08:23.000000000 -0700
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c	2007-11-03 11:08:36.000000000 -0700
@@ -458,16 +458,23 @@ static void arp_reply(struct sk_buff *sk
 	netpoll_send_skb(np, send_skb);
 }
 
-int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
+bool __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	int proto, len, ulen;
 	struct iphdr *iph;
 	struct udphdr *uh;
 	struct netpoll_info *npi = skb->dev->npinfo;
-	struct netpoll *np = npi->rx_np;
+	struct netpoll *np;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (!npi)
+		return false;
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&npi->rx_lock, flags);
+	np = npi->rx_np;
 	if (!np)
 		goto out;
+
 	if (skb->dev->type != ARPHRD_ETHER)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -528,20 +535,22 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	np->rx_hook(np, ntohs(uh->source),
 		    (char *)(uh+1),
 		    ulen - sizeof(struct udphdr));
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&npi->rx_lock, flags);
 
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-	return 1;
+	return true;
 
 out:
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&npi->rx_lock, flags);
 	/* If packet received while already in poll then just
 	 * silently drop.
 	 */
 	if (atomic_read(&trapped)) {
 		kfree_skb(skb);
-		return 1;
+		return true;
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	return false;
 }
 
 void netpoll_print_options(const char *name, struct netpoll *np)

-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-11-03 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-03 18:43 [PATCH 00/11] netpoll cleanups Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-03 18:43 ` [PATCH 01/11] netpoll: use skb_queue_purge Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-20  3:15   ` David Miller
2007-11-03 18:43 ` [PATCH 02/11] netpoll: netpoll_poll cleanup Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-20  3:21   ` David Miller
2007-11-03 18:43 ` [PATCH 03/11] netpoll: no need to store local_mac Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-20  3:23   ` David Miller
2007-11-03 18:43 ` [PATCH 04/11] netpoll: alternative implementation of dropping Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-20  3:25   ` David Miller
2007-11-03 18:43 ` [PATCH 05/11] netpoll: dont need rx_flags Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-20  3:39   ` David Miller
2007-11-03 18:43 ` [PATCH 06/11] netpoll: remove dev_name for npinfo Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-20  3:47   ` David Miller
2007-11-20  4:07     ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-03 18:43 ` [PATCH 07/11] netpoll: get rid of name parameter Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-20  3:49   ` David Miller
2007-11-03 18:43 ` [PATCH 08/11] netpoll: NETPOLL_TRAP configuration change Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-20  3:52   ` David Miller
2007-11-03 18:43 ` [PATCH 09/11] netpoll: ethernet devices only Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-20  3:55   ` David Miller
2007-11-20  4:14     ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-03 18:43 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2007-11-20  4:00   ` [PATCH 10/11] netpoll: rx optimization David Miller
2007-11-03 18:43 ` [PATCH 11/11] netpoll: rx use RCU Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-20  4:00   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071103184338.982195631@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=satyam@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).