From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] ipv6: RFC4214 Support Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:37:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20071106.223705.246628214.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20071107.145550.50882731.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: dlstevens@us.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:44947 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750821AbXKGGhL (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 01:37:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: David Stevens Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 22:07:44 -0800 > > I guess license is no longer required for implementers of ISATAP. > > Is it right, Fred? > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/550/ > > Does this also allow license-free redistribution? > > I'm certainly no lawyer, but I don't see the point of > having a patent that doesn't restrict *something*. :-) That is my interpretation as well. It allows license free implementation, but not distribution of said implementation.